The Joys of Agnosticism

merrygo

There used to be a merry-go-round in the park where I would play as a child. About eight feet in diameter, its smooth metal deck sat centered on a very well-worn and well-lubricated hub, so that there was almost no limit to the speed with which it could be spun. Grab bars stood sentry at the edge of the carousel, and in the 1980s this was probably considered a safety feature. Today I suspect that these particular kinds of playground installations are considered unsafe, and have become an endangered species, as I have not seen one myself in quite some time.

There was one spot on the carousel that was completely safe from the dangerous action of physics: the center. At the center, the speed of the merry-go-round didn’t matter; the world was still, there, turning gently. At the edge, there was frenzied motion, centrifugal force hurling bodies into the dirt, while they tried to jump on or off, or cling to the bars hoping to not be thrown from the carriage as it went.

As it is with belief. I have friends who believe. Some believe in a higher power, and are devoted to religious teachings, and they look beyond the physical plane for meaning in their lives. Others believe that all of this is nonsense and cannot possibly be worthwhile at all: Atheists. Atheists are interesting because they see themselves as somehow different from religious people. Many of them see faith as weakness, or ignorance, or even evil. They are certain that there is no deity watching from beyond, no soul that survives the inevitable collapse of the corpuscular envelope, and a cosmic origin that will, one day, neatly fit into the tenets of contemporary physics. They seem comfortable in these beliefs, and yet they often react to contrary ideas as if they are somehow perverted, or dangerous. They also might bristle at the suggestion that they are themselves believers, but this is what I like to call them, because from my perspective this is what they are.

The Christian tells me that God most certainly exists. They cannot prove it, but some of them try, in futility. They offer up the Bible as proof, they offer up miracles as proof, or they offer up their own personal experiences as proof. None of it is very convincing. Some of their proof is offensive to the Jew, or the Muslim, and most of it is offensive to the Atheist. In the end, they often confess that there is no proof and one simply must “take it on faith.”

The Atheist, on the other hand, tells me that God most certainly does not exist, but they can’t seem to prove it either. When the lack of tangible evidence is not sufficient, they offer up scriptural contradictions and sectarian bickering as proof, they offer up the atrocities committed by religious people as proof, and they offer up the accomplishments of science as proof. None of that is very convincing either. Perhaps I am expected to take it on faith.

I cannot reach into the beyond to know whether a deity is there watching. I cannot yet witness the moment when life leaves my body to see where it goes, if anywhere, and I’m in no rush to. I cannot calculate the origin of matter in a universe that is assumed to have, at some point in the past, contained none. And I decided long ago that I don’t need answers to any of these questions in order to have a meaningful life.

In the center of the merry-go-round, looking out just beyond the edge where chaos is waiting, I feel comfortable enough that I don’t need to hold on. As soon as I step in any direction, however, I can feel myself being pulled further in that direction, and I wrestle myself back to the center where it is calm, and peaceful, and both of my hands are free to grasp whatever is coming next. If intelligent life is discovered in another star system, I can deal with that. If an old, bearded, Caucasian man descends from the heavens on a flaming chariot to dispense judgement upon all of mankind, I guess I can deal with that too. If nutritionists tell us that saturated fat is healthy to consume, and epicures tell us that white wine is appropriate to have with red meat, and the British tell us that Churchill did in fact order the sinking of the Lusitania to draw America into the War, and America decides to join the rest of the world by converting to the metric system, then I can deal with it. If I have a soul, and that soul is immortal, then I suppose it might know where to go after the body it currently inhabits is no longer a suitable container, and whatever I become at that point will probably not make a whole lot of sense to the people I leave behind. Many of them will cling to whatever they can grab in their corner of the carousel, and while trapped there assure themselves and others that they have found a safe place, and that I am on my way to Heaven, or Hell, or oblivion. If anyone then finds themselves in the center, perhaps they will feel as stable there as I felt, and perhaps their grip will loosen so that they might be ready to grasp whatever is coming next for them.

We’re number… three?

tigger_notext

Regular season play is over and we’re moving into the NFL playoffs. This is always a stressful time for us Bengal fans, who have watched our team reach the playoffs for the last four years consecutively, only to be eliminated immediately each and every time. Under Marvin Lewis, our playoff record is 0-6. That’s shameful, but it’s also another discussion for another day.

We will be facing the Pittsburgh Steelers on Saturday night in the wildcard round, and that adds another level of stress because the Steelers are our nemesis. They ended our playoff run in 2005 with a crucial injury to our star quarterback at the time: Carson Palmer. The Steelers would go on to win Super Bowl XL that year as the #6 seed, same as they are ten years later today. The Bengals were the #3 seed that year, same as they are ten years later today as well. Psychologically, playing Pittsburgh in the wildcard round is about as harrowing as it gets. So why do we have to play them again?

If you’re not a sports geek, you might not understand seeding and you might not understand why it matters. Other resources exist to explain who gets into the playoffs and how the matchups are decided. I’ll leave that to them. When you have a 3-way tie for the best record in the conference however, things get a little bit more complicated.

I was wondering at the conclusion of the regular season why the Bengals are the #3 seed when their record is the same as The Broncos and The Patriots. The Denver Broncos are 12-4 and they’re #1 in the AFC. The New England Patriots are 12-4 and they’re #2 in the AFC. Those two teams get to sit on their asses this week and rest. The Cincinnati Bengals are 12-4 and they’re #3 in the AFC, so they have to defend their division title in the wildcard round by hosting the #6 Steelers. But why?

This was beyond the limits of my football knowledge. I had to understand. Was it chance? Divine will? Politics and palm-greasing? A vast conspiracy designed to keep the Bengals locked in a dance of death with our nemesis until the end of time because the NFL secretly hates us? Surely it had to be that last one…

No. The short answer is that the Bengals lost to the Texans. There’s another team who has ruined the playoffs for us a time or two. 2011? 2012? Let’s not walk down memory lane there…

The NFL’s tie-breaking procedures ensure that there can be no true equals, even when multiple teams have matching records.

So let’s walk through how the Bengals came to be the #3 seed:

The first step is to realize that you have a 3-way tie, with 3 teams all having 12-4 records.

3-way-tieThen you begin the tie-breaking procedures for 3 or more teams:

1: Apply division tie breaker to eliminate all but the highest ranked club in each division prior to proceeding to step 2. The original seeding within a division upon application of the division tie breaker remains the same for all subsequent applications of the procedure that are necessary to identify the two Wild-Card participants.

Rule #1 is irrelevant for this discussion because there are no tie records in any division this year, and these three teams have already won their divisions uncontested.

2: Head-to-head sweep. (Applicable only if one club has defeated each of the others or if one club has lost to each of the others.)

Rule #2 applies in this case because the Broncos beat The Patriots and the Bengals both. That puts them in the #1 position, guaranteed.

DEN-1Now that a winner has been determined and a 2-way tie still exists for the second seed, we start the process over again with two teams. The 2-team procedure is slightly different, but mostly the same:

1: Head-to-head, if applicable.

Rule #1 is not applicable because the Bengals and Patriots did not play each other.

2: Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the conference.

Rule #2 is indeterminate because the Patriots and Bengals both won 9 conference games and lost 3.

3: Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games, minimum of four.

This is where our Bengals fall to #3. The Bengals and Patriots played 4 common opponents this season. Having 4 common opponents is a requirement of this rule to be applicable. Without 4 common opponents at minimum, rule #3 would not apply and we would move on to rule #4.

4-common-L

Since the Patriots are 3-1 in these four games and the Bengals are 2-2, The Patriots are selected as the #2 seed and the Bengals fall to #3 by default.

seedsAnd there you have it. Total fairness. Or maybe it’s divine will. In any case, lots of nail-biting is going to precede the game on Saturday. Hopefully that divine will is on our side this time; we’re long overdue.